W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: "objective" clarified

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:52:13 -0500 (EST)
To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
cc: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0112062251090.26031-100000@tux.w3.org>
Right. And I was under the impression that what we actually agreed to was
that requirements had to be testable. So it seems we are on the right track.



On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Cynthia Shelly wrote:

  I don't think it actually matters that a guideline is objective, as long
  as it is testable.  I think Gregg's original definition is a long way
  towards a definition of "testable".
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2001 22:52:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:39 UTC