- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 13:11:42 -0500 (EST)
- To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- cc: "_W3C-WAI Web Content Access. Guidelines List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yes, I think some idea of why it is worth doing more than level-A (at least for WCAG 1) would be a good thing for this grop to contribute to, both at a technical and where practical a business case level. A particular point is that there are some groups who are apparently not well served by low levels of accessibility,and for whom it is particularly imortant to have a sufficiently high level that they can participate in relevant activities. Chaals On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Lisa Seeman wrote: If I am meant to be discussing this hear... I think it would be interesting to make a case for "general / minimum accessibility" and a separate case for total AAA+, state of the art, accessibility. , and see if we can not undo some of the "I am bobby approved and that is enough" attitude. All the best, Lisa Seeman 1866 654 8680 www.GlobalFormats.com Widen the World Web -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2001 13:11:44 UTC