- From: Graham Oliver <graham_oliver@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:32:02 +0100 (BST)
- To: gv@trace.wisc.edu
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I find it interesting that an institution that has such a strong reason to make a web site accessible should 'choose' this level of conformance. One of the things that I have been thinking hard about is 'If people want to do accessibility what is in it for them to aim for anything higher than the 'lowest level'?' Pulling together a couple of ideas mooted by Al Gilman in this post [1] and myself in this post [2]. Perhaps we should be borrowing from the experience in other 'disability domains' when considering conformance. The most obvious one would appear to be building (bricks and mortar) accessibility? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001OctDec/0099.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001OctDec/0098.html Cheers Graham Oliver ===== 'Making on-line information accessible' Mobile Phone : +64 25 919 724 - New Zealand Work Phone : +64 9 846 6995 - New Zealand AIM ID : grahamolivernz ____________________________________________________________ Nokia Game is on again. Go to http://uk.yahoo.com/nokiagame/ and join the new all media adventure before November 3rd.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 13:32:07 UTC