W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Normative and Non-Normative - Why?

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:49:32 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011016063832.00a337d0@pop.erols.com>
To: Graham Oliver <graham_oliver@yahoo.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Graham,

         Others will correct my perception, but basically "normative" 
refers to those things which have a clear dividing line between what is and 
isn't accessible. Non-normative are those things for which a range of 
accessibility is necessary and for which no one wants to commit to a clear 
dividing line because it will automatically dis-include some whose web use 
depends on those things.

         Normative presumes that if your site passes some machine test, it 
is considered conformant even tho the meat of accessibility hasn't been 
met. Non-normative means a human has to look at the site and decide if it 
complies.

                                         Anne

At 02:24 AM 10/16/01 +0100, Graham Oliver wrote:
>Before I become assimilated <grin> would someone
>please explain to me why the huge emphasis on whether
>something is 'normative' or 'non-normative'.
>The use of the word 'normative' in the Guidelines
>Document strikes me as being a jargon word and a
>potential barrier to understanding.
>
>Cheers
>Graham Oliver
>
>=====
>'Making on-line information accessible'
>Mobile Phone : +64 25 919 724 - New Zealand
>Work Phone : +64 9 846 6995 - New Zealand
>AIM ID : grahamolivernz
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
>or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie

Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2001 06:53:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT