W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

When is a checkpoint N/A

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 22:39:18 -0500
To: "GLWAI Guidelines WG \(GL - WAI Guidelines WG\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002101c14faa$cf601620$066fa8c0@750>

Charles wrote:
Summary: There are cases where a checkpoint must be marked not
applicable, since meeting the checkpoint would contradict the purpose of
some content. We should provide examples of where this makes sense, and
where it does not.


GV: Thanks Charles for this format (summary first).  Very helpful


So do we
a) list specifically those conditions under which conformance can be
achieved by just saying that some checkpoints are N/A
or
b) leave it up to the authors to decide when they can ignore a
checkpoint and still claim conformance
or
c) something else ?


Gregg


-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Human Factors
Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
Director - Trace R & D Center
Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/>
FAX 608/262-8848 
For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
<mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2001 23:39:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT