W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Suggested format for the WCAG 2.0

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:22:16 -0800
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010316082034.00c8f3f0@garth.idyllmtn.com>
To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough)
Cc: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "GL - WAI Guidelines WG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 08:09 AM 3/16/2001 , William Loughborough wrote:
>At 09:05 AM 3/16/01 -0600, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>>The last item is a statement that this element is not used.
>
>Seems to imply a division along "element" lines rather than "checkpoint" lines? So are the "solutions" thusly divided (perhaps each "element" of a "technology" must be under some checkpoint)?

I'm not sure what the term "element" means here.  The example --
of the IMG HTML element -- may imply that we are talking about
markup elements, or that we are talking about particular
"components" of a technology.

It might make more sense to say that the last item is a statement
that the checkpoint does not apply _BECAUSE_ "no images are used
on the page" or whatever.

--Kynn

Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Tel +1 949-567-7006
________________________________________
ACCESSIBILITY IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com
Received on Friday, 16 March 2001 11:33:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT