W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Agenda

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:03:26 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010315125954.032b5380@mail.gorge.net>
To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 12:54 PM 3/15/01 +1100, Jason White wrote:
>At the face to face meeting, there was opposition to calling them "techniques"

Why was this brought up?

Was there support for calling them "techniques"?

Isn't it a bit late to be changing this since the consensus was reached a 
few years ago? Where were the "opposition" then?

The words "techniques document" although referring to a non-normative item 
might themselves be normative?

Isn't this like the argument we resolved about "principles" vs. "guidelines"?

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2001 16:03:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT