W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: distraction: bane or content?

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:37:21 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, WAI <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 06:26 AM 3/12/2001 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
>   Should we then have one of these also for all Gestalt and visual perception
>   related laws, such as, don't rely on proximity/texture/size/shape alone to
>   point out similarities/differencies? Don't rely on good continuation or
>   closure alone.
>CMN In theory. I think in practice that's a lot of what we are saying, but in
>different words.
>MRK [snip]
>   Authors could provide enough semantic information so that users don't have
>   to rely on visual presentation. And when they do provide the semantics it
>   also becomes easier to change the presentation with stylesheets.
>CMN This  is the basic key. (And is something we say in more or less those
>words already).

But we don't say anything about how to use class names, or do we now? That 
would be one thing helping to change the stylesheets when needed.

Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 09:42:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:59:18 UTC