W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: distraction: bane or content?

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:37:21 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010312083246.028b49f0@localhost>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, WAI <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 06:26 AM 3/12/2001 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
>
>   Should we then have one of these also for all Gestalt and visual perception
>   related laws, such as, don't rely on proximity/texture/size/shape alone to
>   point out similarities/differencies? Don't rely on good continuation or
>   closure alone.
>
>CMN In theory. I think in practice that's a lot of what we are saying, but in
>different words.
>
>MRK [snip]
>   Authors could provide enough semantic information so that users don't have
>   to rely on visual presentation. And when they do provide the semantics it
>   also becomes easier to change the presentation with stylesheets.
>
>CMN This  is the basic key. (And is something we say in more or less those
>words already).

But we don't say anything about how to use class names, or do we now? That 
would be one thing helping to change the stylesheets when needed.


>cheers
>
>Chaals
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 09:42:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT