W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: distraction: bane or content?

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:26:04 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010312051530.05ae6210@mail.gorge.net>
To: WAI <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 10:41 PM 3/11/01 -0500, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
>Authors could provide enough semantic information

If that "could" moves through "should" towards "must" we'd be getting well 
along.

The general aim of "repurposing" demands that in many cases authors (or the 
choice mechanisms provided for selection/presentation of content) must 
convey what they mean, i.e. the underlying semantics of whatever 
structural/presentational elements they use.

This process is involved in all the principles, particularly 
"Transformable" and "Controllable". Of course the conveyance must be 
"Comprehensible" and attention need be paid to "Compatible".

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 08:26:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT