- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 02:05:41 -0800
- To: "Marti" <marti@agassa.com>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Cc: "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 04:49 AM 3/9/01 -0500, Marti wrote:
>To get anywhere we need to get people DOING IT, for that we need a clear
>path and some good rationale for changing methods that 'always worked before'.
This is what I was trying to say but much more *real-world*!
In the final analysis I believe (*strongly*?) that this is far more in the
purview of EO than GL - sort of "GL propose - EO dispose". If the charter
says elsewise, it's just wrong.
If we bother our pretty little heads about whether CSS is well-supported or
that tables are being used for layout (or that people still use <font>,
etc., etc., etc., etc.) then we can not do the necessarily
forward-compatible stuff that's at the heart of making new
guidelines/checkpoints.
Please some chairperson declare this entire avenue (at least for GL) a
*rathole*.
ENOUGH ALREADY!
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 05:06:06 UTC