W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Fw: March 2 F2F Minutes (checkpoint discussion)----Original Message-----

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 18:27:58 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010308182758.007c3ce0@pop.erols.com>
To: "Matt May" <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, "WAI" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Matt,

	And this script is set to indefinite loops? Argghh... A true case for the
back button! ... Seriously, tho, does such a page exist in which someone
has put crawling ants, rats, butterflies, etc. across a page of serious
text? Or are we discussing a hypothetical example? 

						Anne

At 02:59 PM 3/8/01 -0800, Matt May wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Anne Pemberton" <apembert@erols.com>
>>     Doesn't the Stop button stop all everything on the page? If so, what
>is
>> the problem? Does stop not exist or work the same way in all browsers?
>
>In the case of the walking ants, the Stop button can't control that. All it
>controls in IE on Windows, for example, is embedded audio and animated GIFs.
>It's not a standard. Actually, the Stop button itself isn't even a standard
>insofar as it's a user-agent widget. UAAG would have to specify its
>behavior, and even then, the walking-ants analogy would probably sneak
>through, as the Stop button would have to stop script execution on the page
>to stop the motion of the ants, and there's no way to selectively disable
>scripts or (that I'm aware of) to force cleanup/garbage collection on any
>given script.
>
>-
>m
>
>
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 18:23:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:09 GMT