W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle

From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:12:11 +0200
Message-ID: <002601c0754c$1e179480$2fa1003e@seeman>
To: "Marti" <marti@agassa.com>, "WAI" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I do not think that that is our job.

We are writing guidelines for how to be accessible.

Legal minds must work out how to use that information in legislation. Part
of that process will be definition of formula for defining terms  such as
"due burden"

-----Original Message-----
From: Marti <marti@agassa.com>
To: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle

>It seems like what we are reaching for here is something along the lines of
>the "undue burden" clause in the ADA.  The ADA defines undue burden in
>of a % of cost and allows some exceptions for things like historic sites.
>Can we classify the "consideration X" issues into a few broad categories
>     undue risk to intellectual property
>     more than x% of the total cost of the website
>     .......
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 01:11:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:35 UTC