At 09:11 PM 9/29/00 -0700, Anne Pemberton wrote: >Seriously, what would be the issues if a multi-media vehicle, such as >Flash, would not require a "text equivalent" WL: Material on the Web has semantics and if that meaning is ONLY available through visual apparati then those without retinae (including those accessing via lynx, images-off, etc.) would be excluded. We have become so (almost pathologically) dependent on eyesight that we're in danger of losing vision. Awareness of this is central to humanity. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGEReceived on Friday, 29 September 2000 22:10:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:50:43 GMT