Re: Status of RTF format?

In order to comply with WCAG there need to be various things included, like
text alternatives for non-text objects, markup to specify the language of
things, that they are abbreviations, a seperation of presentation information
from content, and so on.

Some of these things can be achieved in RTF, some I don't believe can, and in
some cases there is a huge gulf between can and routinely are.

I don't know that there is a consensus in the group (unless everyone agrees
with me <grin/>) - what would you suggest it should be?

Charles McCN

On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Greg Gay wrote:

  My question is, if a developer includes rtf copies of word processed
  documents on a web site, are they obliged to include an html version in
  order to satisfy guideline 11.1?