W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Reviewer role for WCAG

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 13:14:24 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Cc: JBrewer@w3.org, dd@w3.org

	After reading the description, I think I could fit the role well, but
since my interest is primarily with the "cognitive, learning, and
intellectual" disabilities, I feel I may be left out of discussions which
should include these groups but which may not be originally apparent to
those who raise issues. I'm catching up with about a week's worth of posts
to this list this evening, and responded to one about a prototype (from
Scott) in which I raise what I hope are succinct issues about the range of
variations in disabilities which would lead to omissions in considerations
if a "prototype" type of approach to guidelines is ever adopted. 


At 02:39 PM 3/1/2000 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>The chairs and I have been discussing a "Reviewer" role for the working 
>group.  I thought that this had been discussed at one of the telecons, but 
>I don't see it represented in any of the minutes since January.
>I have drafted a new "how to join" that includes information about the 
>reviewer role.  it is available at 
>here is an excerpt:
>How to become a WCAG WG Reviewer
>We realize that many people are unable to commit 4 hours per week to a 
>voluntary project. To encourage participation by a wide variety of people, 
>we have created a "Reviewer" role for this working group.
>Reviewers will be sent materials for review based on their particular 
>interests and expertise.  These materials will have specific questions for 
>the reviewer to consider. We anticipate that a reviewer could go for a 
>couple of months without hearing from us or hear from us a couple times in 
>one month depending on which issues are under discussion.
>Please fill out a request to join as suggested above along with the 
>following information:
>[ ] I would like to join the working group as a Reviewer.
>My specific areas of interest are:
>[ ] Issues for people with visual disabilities
>[ ] Issues for people with cognitive, learning, and intellectual disabilities
>[ ] Issues for people with hearing disabilities
>[ ] Issues for people with physical disabilities
>[ ] Assistive technology
>[ ] Authoring Tools
>[ ] User Agents
>[ ] Graphic Design
>[ ] Non-W3C technologies (Flash, PDF, ECMA/JavaScript, Java, etc.)
>[ ] Usability testing
>[ ] Other.  Please explain.
>are there other specific areas of interest we ought to include in the list?
>do people agree that a reviewer role would be beneficial?
>should we more clearly define the commitment or expectations?
>other thoughts? questions? comments?
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>madison, wi usa
>tel: +1 608 663 6346
Anne L. Pemberton
Enabling Support Foundation
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2000 06:18:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:31 UTC