W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Reviewer role for WCAG

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 14:54:26 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000301145241.00a63d70@localhost>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, JBrewer@w3.org, dd@w3.org
Charles,

Your comment suggests that we should not include "Authoring Tools" and 
"User Agents" in the list of interests.  I can understand that and agree to 
delete those two checks.

however, I'm not clear if you support formalizing the role or not.

--wendy

At 02:44 PM 3/1/00 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>A reviewer role is extremely helpful. Although we did not formalise it in AU
>we had seveeral people who had agreed to act in such a way, and the UA group
>also put considerable effort into securing commitments to review from people
>who were not able to be full participants in the working group.
>
>It would seem that if someone's interest is in Authoring Tools or User Agents
>perhaps they should be encouraged to join the relevant working groups (or act
>as reviewers for those groups). I think that there is a need for the
>different groups to review each others' work (in particular AU has a very
>heavy dependency on WCAG) but I think that review needs to be done by members
>of the actual working group.
>
>Cheers
>
>Charles McCN
>
>On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>
>   Hello,
>
>   The chairs and I have been discussing a "Reviewer" role for the working
>   group.  I thought that this had been discussed at one of the telecons, but
>   I don't see it represented in any of the minutes since January.
>
>[etc]

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
madison, wi usa
tel: +1 608 663 6346
/--
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2000 14:49:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:01 GMT