W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Dating conformance Re: URI correction Re: minutes posted

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:54:39 -0500
Message-ID: <3887D87F.7F470990@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
CC: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
> Thanks Al.
> 
> To take up an issue:
> 
> I am going to pretend for a minute that there are no until User
> Agents... clauses. And then I'll get back to the real world. But humour me a
> moment, if you will...
> 
> If the working group changes the requirements, for example by publishing WCAG
> 1.1 or 2.0 or something, then one of the things we could do is explicitly
> request that WCAG 1.0 be moved from Recommendation Status to former
> recommendation or obsolete recommendation or something. 
> There curently isn't
> such a thing in the process of W3C, so it would need to be approved by the
> Advisory Council/Committee (I don't recall what they are at the minute -
> basically the members) but if it is a good idea then we have a duty to ask
> for it anyway.

I don't agree. There's no need to require new process. You just
tell the AC during the review that document A will obsolete document
B and they agree to that or they done.

 - Ian
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2000 22:54:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:01 GMT