W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: 2nd try: proposal for errata for guideline 1 rationale

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:48:57 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990917084857.007cfb30@apembert.pop.crosslink.net>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I agree. The new wording clarifies the situation and pinpoints the people
for whom synthesized speech is useful. 

				Anne

At 01:29 PM 9/16/1999 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>
>The entry in the errata page might read something like this:
>3.  Clarification of rationale for Guideline 1
>Added: 17 September 1999
>Class: clarification
>The rationale for Guideline 1 says "...Synthesized
>speech is critical for individuals who are blind and for many people with
>the reading difficulties that often accompany cognitive disabilities,
>learning disabilities, and deafness...." It should say, "Synthesized speech
>is critical for individuals who are blind and for many people with reading
>disabilities."
>
>
Anne L. Pemberton
http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1
http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Homeschooling
apembert@crosslink.net
Enabling Support Foundation
http://www.enabling.org
Received on Friday, 17 September 1999 08:34:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:00 GMT