W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Offline reading techniques

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:40:02 -0500 (EST)
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, Misha Wolf <misha.wolf@reuters.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9903101738400.18094-100000@tux.w3.org>
Amaya actually traverses such links to 'make book', allowing you to do
this. But I agree that much of this belongs in the techniques document
only.

Charles

(PS I like most of your suggestions Misha - thanks)

On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Al Gilman wrote:

  At 04:31 PM 3/10/99 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote:
  >Misha Wolf wrote:
  >
  >> 11.  Checkpoint 15.9
  >> 
  >>      Context:
  >>      "Facilitate off-line browsing by creating a single downloadable file
  >>      for documents that exist as a series of separate pages. [Priority 3]
  >>      For example, in HTML use the LINK element. Or create an archive of the
  >>      different pages (e.g., with zip, gzip, stuffit, etc.)."
  >> 
  >>      I'm baffled by the sentence "For example, in HTML use the LINK
  element."
  >>      It would appear that two distinct issues have got collapsed into one.
  >
  >I agree. There are trwo problems in the example part of 15.9:
  >  a) The LINK element should be mentioned in a checkpoint about
  >     navigation tools (that may be synthesized by UAs).
  >  b) The part about archives is another solution that is not
  >     related to the checkpoint. This has to be cleared up.
  
  Sorry.
  
  Point a) -- there is in the HTML specification a remark suggesting that
  LINK markup be used to annotate the structure of a super-document tree
  composed of multiple HTML elements/files.  That is why LINK is mentioned
  here.  This is a pretty academic point, however.  Perhaps in the
  _techniques_ for this guideline, we can refer the reader to a tool that
  walks the LINKs and merges the document in a print-to-file pass.
  
  Point b) -- The .zip solution is related in that it facilitates review
  while the user is not paying connect time charges.  Admittedly it is an
  alternative to the literal satisfaction of the guideline as presently
  stated.  But it is a technique addressing some of the same problems.
  
  To create a guideline that fits both techniques, one could perhaps broaden
  it to: "Facilitate offline reading of the material at a time and in a tool
  of the user's choice."
  
  Technique 1: Composite document in plain text file.
  
  Technique 2: .zip etc. archive of document.
  
  Al
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 1999 17:40:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:59 GMT