W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 1998

New Sectioning for the PA guidelines

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 15:50:30 +0200
Message-Id: <199808061350.PAA20177@www47.inria.fr>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

I raised this issue in Peterborough and took an action item to clarify 
what I meant by email.

The current document has 5 sections:

A Modality Independence.
B Output Display Independence.
C Control Device Independence.
D Meta-information.
E General Recommendations.

I think it's too complex and it's hard to understand what modality vs
output vs control device means, compared to say, meta-information
(it's all meta data at some level...).

For instance, how does "graceful degradation" (C.1) relates to
"C. Control Device Independence." ?

Or, why aren't "grouping selection in form" and "using list for list"
not in the same section ? why aren't "title for frame" and "alt for
imagemap" not together (they both allow for building a serialized
version of an otherwise 2-D graphical presentation) ?

I think we should aim for 2 or 3 sections:

 A Descriptive information
 B Structure/Navigation 

Under "Descriptive information", I would put
 - image alt, longdesc, video caption, audio transcipt, 
   frame title, abbrev, acronym, alt script/applet

All the things one has to add (i.e. attach) to pieces of data in the
Under "Structure/Navigation"
 - separation content/style, lang, nesting, keyaccess, 
   form grouping, table markup, link phrase, color scheme

Thinds are that are more intrinsic to the document "fiber".

A third possible section would be like section E today: "General guidelines"
 - comply to standard HTML/CSS
 - if all fail, use text-only page

although this could be folded in the intro (for HTML/CSS) and the
conclucion (for text-only)

I think this would greatly simplify the understanding of the
Received on Thursday, 6 August 1998 09:50:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:27 UTC