W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > November 2001

Re: My first EARL client..

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:22:45 -0000
Message-ID: <02a601c16d41$bf17e2c0$ca969dc3@emedia.co.uk>
To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
"Nick Kew":
> > I have one question, that you're probably best served to answer - How
do I
> > combine two EARL reports, say a validation pass, but then a human
coming
> > in and saying, No, that's no good it fails WCAG 3.1 - how would I
combine
> > those in a single EARL report? - at the moment I was just going to
use my
> > moomin report as a catchall for a whole basket, but I might aswell do
it
> > properly and actually collate the reports of different test tools
into
> > one.
>
> That looks like an agenda item for next meeting.

I'm now rewriting the backend so that it stores things in a more
combinable and searchable format, and is this the right method for
combining multiple pass/fails in a single assertion?

http://www.e-media.co.uk/earldev/query.asp?http://jibbering.com/

It passes the validator, but I'm not to sure about the graph, (mind you
I'm not too sure about the graph when there's only one - I think  my RDF
understanding isn't completely there.)

The idea is that people upload EARL reports, I extract the predicates,
and then just serve up this combination, making the full reports
available from the "moomin:original" url - perhaps adding in other
properties identifying which validator and things.

Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 14:24:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:39 GMT