W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2001

Re: example of site where text-only does not convey all info

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:15:08 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010122151236.02a39190@mail.gorge.net>
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
At 02:44 PM 1/22/01 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>What does equivalent mean?

It probably means that if the site is accessed via "Wife/Hubby 1.0 Access 
System" it will be no more effective than if it is accessed via the 
"alternative site"? That the user visiting said site will have 
*satisfactory* experience compared to someone using the "real" site?

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 18:14:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:38 GMT