W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2001

Re: example of site where text-only does not convey all info

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:25:01 -0800
Message-Id: <>
To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough)
Cc: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
At 03:15 PM 1/22/2001 , William Loughborough wrote:
>At 02:44 PM 1/22/01 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>>What does equivalent mean?
>It probably means that if the site is accessed via "Wife/Hubby 1.0 Access System" it will be no more effective than if it is accessed via the "alternative site"? That the user visiting said site will have *satisfactory* experience compared to someone using the "real" site?

Hm, interesting -- so it's equivalent satisfaction?

Is it emotional equivalence we're striving for?


Kynn Bartlett  <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                http://kynn.com/
Technical Developer Relations, Reef           http://www.reef.com/
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet   http://idyllmtn.com/
Contributor, Special Ed. Using XHTML     http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml
Unofficial Section 508 Checklist       http://kynn.com/+section508
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 18:31:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:31 UTC