At 03:15 PM 1/22/2001 , William Loughborough wrote: >At 02:44 PM 1/22/01 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote: >>What does equivalent mean? > >It probably means that if the site is accessed via "Wife/Hubby 1.0 Access System" it will be no more effective than if it is accessed via the "alternative site"? That the user visiting said site will have *satisfactory* experience compared to someone using the "real" site? Hm, interesting -- so it's equivalent satisfaction? Is it emotional equivalence we're striving for? --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Technical Developer Relations, Reef http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://idyllmtn.com/ Contributor, Special Ed. Using XHTML http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml Unofficial Section 508 Checklist http://kynn.com/+section508Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 18:31:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:38 GMT