- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:25:01 -0800
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough)
- Cc: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
At 03:15 PM 1/22/2001 , William Loughborough wrote: >At 02:44 PM 1/22/01 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote: >>What does equivalent mean? > >It probably means that if the site is accessed via "Wife/Hubby 1.0 Access System" it will be no more effective than if it is accessed via the "alternative site"? That the user visiting said site will have *satisfactory* experience compared to someone using the "real" site? Hm, interesting -- so it's equivalent satisfaction? Is it emotional equivalence we're striving for? --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Technical Developer Relations, Reef http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://idyllmtn.com/ Contributor, Special Ed. Using XHTML http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml Unofficial Section 508 Checklist http://kynn.com/+section508
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 18:31:10 UTC