At 05:58 PM 4/20/01 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: >A few people have mentioned a desire to see N3 stabilise (eg. to use >inline in RDF-related specs), so maybe this is worth pursuing. Does go >against the general XML tide though... "General tide" isn't exactly a tsunumi! It wouldn't be as if the more "insider" representation were to be abandoned just the possibility of slightly-more-human-readable "scribblings"? -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGEReceived on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 21:40:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:38 GMT