- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:41:19 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
At 05:58 PM 4/20/01 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
>A few people have mentioned a desire to see N3 stabilise (eg. to use
>inline in RDF-related specs), so maybe this is worth pursuing. Does go
>against the general XML tide though...
"General tide" isn't exactly a tsunumi! It wouldn't be as if the more
"insider" representation were to be abandoned just the possibility of
slightly-more-human-readable "scribblings"?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 21:40:25 UTC