Re: Assertion "tool"

I propose we copy the conformance section from WCAG 1.0 as a start on this.
(Note that this is an endorsement of that system, against the strawman put up
that had a simple yes/no scheme).

cheers

Charles McCN

On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, William Loughborough wrote:

  At 04:30 PM 11/29/00 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >it is only a case of having an annotation that specifically includes the
  >bit of RDF you are looking for - that is next on the development agenda.

  Since it is on the agenda then we might want to recommend that WCAG 2.0
  provide a spot for it in the guidelines?

  Specifically that there be a "placeholder" sort of thing that deals with
  making a conformance assertion in order to be conformant?

  --
  Love.
                   ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
September - November 2000:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France