At 04:30 PM 11/29/00 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >it is only a case of having an annotation that specifically includes the >bit of RDF you are looking for - that is next on the development agenda. Since it is on the agenda then we might want to recommend that WCAG 2.0 provide a spot for it in the guidelines? Specifically that there be a "placeholder" sort of thing that deals with making a conformance assertion in order to be conformant? -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGEReceived on Wednesday, 29 November 2000 17:05:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:37 GMT