W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > June 2000

Re: AERT 12.3 proposal

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:55:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
cc: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, WAI ER group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0006151954390.2066-100000@tux.w3.org>
Except that this is not a normative document - it describes
techniques. Specific things you can do, like counting the number of words
or verbs or clauses (depends how smart it is) in a sentence.

It's not so much re-inventing the wheel as going out and finding them.

Cheers

Charles

On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, William Loughborough wrote:

  Rather than codify this requirement into such specific criteria it might
  be worth considering that "long sentences" could be defined variously
  and elsewhere. It's a little like "clear and simple", etc. in that there
  are already published definitions of these things - I think? Something
  about "normative" and "reinventing wheels".
  
  -- 
  Love.
              ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
  http://dicomp.pair.com
  

--
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2000 19:58:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:36 GMT