W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > June 2000

Re: AERT 12.3 proposal

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 07:38:04 -0700
Message-ID: <3948EA4C.2B1B5244@gorge.net>
To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
CC: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, WAI ER group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Rather than codify this requirement into such specific criteria it might
be worth considering that "long sentences" could be defined variously
and elsewhere. It's a little like "clear and simple", etc. in that there
are already published definitions of these things - I think? Something
about "normative" and "reinventing wheels".

-- 
Love.
            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2000 10:38:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:36 GMT