- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:15:25 +0100
- To: "Silas S. Brown" <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
- cc: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, ping@lfw.org
> Is there something wrong with the way I'm using then? Being specific to HTML in HTTP seems to be counter to general sense (nowadays). > 3. It's more complicated. This does not encourage authors of other > gateways to implement it. If you're worried about complexity, HTTP/1.1 already has a very simple Warning header that mediators can use to describe changes to any document. Although not particularly flexible (doesn't support URIs :( I think it should be able to handle your case. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-06.txt Can you check ?
Received on Monday, 8 March 1999 11:16:17 UTC