- From: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:42:21 -0500
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello, there, On 2013-03-08, at 5:16 PM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > Can we just say four times and call that good enough for an easy check that "covers just a few accessibility issues and are designed to be quick and easy, rather than definitive. A web page could seem to pass these checks, yet still have accessibility barriers. More robust evaluation is needed to evaluate all issues comprehensively." ? Considering we're not going for full conformance testing results, I think it would be wiser to align on 4 or 5 "ctrl-+", and not bother so much with the fact that it's really 200% or not. The important part is getting developers to think about low vision and SC 1.4.4 when developing. Stepping away from the SC, and closing in on the intent should be what matters most here. IMHO of course. ;p /Denis
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 22:42:47 UTC