- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:16:20 -0600
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Thanks, Wayne for checking on this. And Denis for replying. See comments below. On 3/8/2013 3:59 PM, Denis Boudreau wrote: > Wayne, > > Shawn mentioned it might be safer to go under 200%, rather than above, in cases where we didn't exactly fall on 200% on some browsers. Therefore, I would suggest 6 times for Firefox and only 3 for Safari. To have separate instructions for firefox on windows and firefox on mac and safari, would add a *lot* complexity. See <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/checks#zoom> Can we just say four times and call that good enough for an easy check that "covers just a few accessibility issues and are designed to be quick and easy, rather than definitive. A web page could seem to pass these checks, yet still have accessibility barriers. More robust evaluation is needed to evaluate all issues comprehensively." ? > It's kinda disturbing however that they don't both fall under the same number of times. It makes it looks weird. :/ > > Do we care enough about Chrome to look for those numbers as well? After all, Chrome is used much more than Safari is... As far as I know, zoom text only functionality is no longer available in Chrome. ~Shawn > > /Denis > > > > > On 2013-03-08, at 4:45 PM, Wayne Dick<wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > >> EOWG >> >> I am using the latest versions of both browsers: >> >> ctl +( 6 times )= 200% in Firefox >> >> ctl + (4 times) = 209% Safari >> ctl + (3 times) = 182% Safari >> >> I propose advising ctl + ... 6 times for Firefox >> and ctl + ... 4 times for Safari. >> >> Wayne >> > >
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 22:16:41 UTC