W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: EOWG - for 16-17 September - Training review comments

From: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:00:31 +0300
Message-Id: <47E0AE3B-17E0-4720-8523-DD0C929D55BE@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I might not be able to join the call today, please see my comments  
below.

On 16 Sep 2010, at 23:09, Shawn Henry wrote:

>
> Training Overview page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/
> Training review survey: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/ 
> waitraining2b/
>
> Most of the comments in the review survey were editorial. Some of  
> the edits were already incorporated in the 20 August version that  
> most people reviewed. The following comments and edits are for EOWG  
> consideration:
>
> 1. Some people suggested that the Presentations and Workshop  
> material was hard to read and seemed congested, partly because of  
> all the links throughout the content bullets. To address this we've  
> unlinked a lot of the text and removed some of the bracketed  
> material. This means readers will need to get the previously linked  
> information from the Topics page, instead of getting it from the  
> outlines pages.
>
> Question: Do these edits take care of the congestion?

I think it does.

>
> 2. In the Workshop material, many of the links went to the WCAG 2.0  
> Understanding or Techniques document. We moved the links from  
> throughout the content bullets to a new section called  
> "Understanding WCAG 2.0" Resources (or "Understanding WCAG 2.0" and  
> "Techniques for WCAG 2.0" Resources).
>
> Question: OK?

I think this is OK, but what about adding "related" so the title says  
"Related Understanding WCAG 2.0 Resources"?

>
> 3. For the Workshop page, there was a suggestion to clarify who  
> might do the training, adjusting the content and examples to suit  
> the audience, etc.
>
> Note that we had previously agreed not to include general  
> presentation and training guidance in this update of the resource.
> Some additional guidance has been added to the "Important Notes"  
> section: http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/workshop-outlines.html#notes
>
> Question: Does this section now adequately clarify that experience  
> is needed to present the material and that the workshop should be  
> customized for the audience, without going into too much detail?

I think it does.

>
> 4. Linking to draft slides.
>
> Question: Is OK to go ahead and add pointers to the following draft  
> slides, or should we wait until they are more done?
> * [DRAFT] Instructions for the "Web Accessibility is Smart  
> Business" Presentation http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/
> * [DRAFT] Instructions for the "Using WCAG 2" Presentation http:// 
> www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/WCAG2_using/

I think it would be better to wait until they are more done.

>
> 5. Any objections to publishing this version as a Draft for public  
> review?

I have no objection publishing this version as a Draft for public  
review.

Regards,
Yeliz.
Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 07:00:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:57 GMT