W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: An answer to the length issue for WCAG 2.0 Documents.

From: William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:13:22 -0800
Message-ID: <1e3451610811190013s3f48d9f6l9cc4af7c3d49d38a@mail.gmail.com>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
It's a bit like saying that the shop manual for an automobile is "hard
reading" or "too long."

Hence Wayne's "The key misunderstanding here is that someone would ever need
to read either document from end to end."

This is totally a non-issue disguised as something that matters and Wayne's
description of the process of *using* the documents rather than actually
*reading* them is spot on.

Love.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:56 PM, <Anna.Zhuang@nokia.com> wrote:

>  those 3 docs will remain uneasy reading.
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 08:14:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 November 2008 08:14:02 GMT