- From: Sylvie duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:36:06 +0100
- To: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>
- Cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello Wayne and all, I have also concerns about this success criterion, as I think, it is difficult to evaluate what is the lower secondary education level. I wonder if this level is the same in any country. How can this be adapted to another country than the US? How is this level specified? Best Sylvie Wayne Dick a écrit : > > 3.1.5 Reading Level: When text requires reading ability more advanced > than the lower secondary education level, supplemental content, or a > version that does not require reading ability more advanced than the > lower secondary education level, is available. (Level AAA) How to Meet > 3.1.5 Understanding 3.1.5 > > I am not sure that a posting of, poetry, creative writing, philosophy, > physics, biochemistry, statistics or mathematics that required first > and second year work university work in the given major could be > expressed at a lower secondary educational level. If we adopt this > criteria then the instructional materials of advanced courses can > never meet Level AAA. Do we want to create a level that an entire > sector cannot meet? > > I think we should create some exception language like: unless > material cannot be simplified or the intent of the writing is to use > language in specific ways. > > This is dangerously close to censorship, and we never know how it > could be used. > > Wayne > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 08:36:53 UTC