In our minutes from the recent face to face, an action was recorded "Alan to do review the document and explain in places where WCAG 2.0 has covered shortcomings in WCAG" [2]. I don't think that this document is the appropriate place to do that. Perhaps I misunderstand the intention, but if there is some other intention, it's not clear from the minutes. It seems to have been Wayne's idea. Clarification, please... regards, Alan [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-mwbp-wcag#notes [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-eo-minutes.html#action01 -- Email: achuter@technosite.es Blogs http://www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 08:44:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 10:45:59 GMT