Re: [DRAFT] EOWG replies to WCAG WG responses on WCAG 2.0 LCWD

Comments below, preceded with "SLH:"

> [DRAFT EOWG REPLIES TO WCAG WG FOLLOWS]
...
> Comment #12: Not accepted, because the revised definition of assistive 
> technology is more difficult to understand than the original.

SLH: I'm not sure there's any need to compare it to the original. We could simplify our comment to: "Not accepted, because the revised definition of assistive technology is still too difficult to understand."

> Comment #26: Not accepted. The short handles in the success criteria are 
> a help, but need them in the guidelines as well.

SLH: How about something like this for wording: "Not accepted. The short handles for the success criteria are very useful. We still suggest providing short handles for the guidelines as well."

<that's all>
~Shawn