W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2007

[DRAFT] EOWG replies to WCAG WG responses on WCAG 2.0 LCWD

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:05:05 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20070531212528.03fa3e70@localhost>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Dear EOWG Participants,

Please review the following, which is the current status of our our replies 
to the WCAG WG's responses on our comments on the WCAG 2.0 Last Call 
Working Draft.

The information is taken mostly from our teleconference discussion last 
week, which was based on our survey responses by then, and any additional 
survey responses received by midnight Eastern time on Thursday. Let  me 
know if you spot any corrections needed.

Here are links to some key pages, in case you want to look anything up:
1. first batch of WCAG WG replies to us: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007AprJun/0044
2. second batch of WCAG WG replies to us: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007AprJun/0045
3. your EOWG survey: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/W2CommentsM07/
4. EOWG survey results: 
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/W2CommentsM07/results
5. WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/
6. WCAG 2.0 updated Public Working Draft: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/
7. Minutes from last week's EOWG call http://www.w3.org/2007/05/25-eo-minutes

Thanks,

- Judy

[DRAFT EOWG REPLIES TO WCAG WG FOLLOWS]

[NOTE: The first sentence after each number is what we would send to WCAG 
WG. If there is a second sentence, in brackets, that is a note just for our 
own follow-up discussion, and would not be included in the follow-up 
response to WCAG WG.]

Comment #1: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #2: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #3: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #4: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #5: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #6: Accept resolution. [New comment: the Quick Reference formatting 
needs to be toned down, particularly wrt overuse of italics.]

Comment #7: (Discuss SAZ comment.)

Comment #8: (Get clarification on Liam's comment.)

Comment #9: Accept resolution. [Need to review "accessibility supported 
technologies.']

Comment #10: Accept resolution. [Need to review "accessibility supported 
technologie."]

Comment #11: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #12: Not accepted, because the revised definition of assistive 
technology is more difficult to understand than the original.

Comment #13: Accept resolution. [New comment: Glossary definitions need 
better formatting.]

Comment #14: Accept resolution.

Comment #15: Accept resolution.

Comment #16: Accept resolution.

Comment #17: Accept resolution. [New comment: Glossary definitions need 
better formatting.]

Comment #18: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #19: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #20: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #21: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #22: Accept resolution. [Discuss whether we want to make a new 
comment on the understandability of "sufficient techniques"]

Comment #23: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #24: Accept resolution. [May have related comments on new draft.]

Comment #25: (Check w/ Wayne on his comment.)

Comment #26: Not accepted. The short handles in the success criteria are a 
help, but need them in the guidelines as well.

Comment #27: Accept resolution. [Discuss whether at least a brief 
definition of these terms is needed in the Introduction to the guidelines.]




-- 
Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G526
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 05:19:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:43 GMT