W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > October to December 2006

Comments on Mini-Tutorial - Re: EOWG: Agenda for 6 October 2006 Teleconference

From: Justin Thorp <juth@loc.gov>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:51:36 -0400
Message-Id: <s5252a58.021@loc.gov>
To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

I find myself wanting to occasionally go back to previous slides.  My first reaction is to hit the back button but that doesn't seem to work.

Is there a way to put a javascript back button in the footer?

Are we going to put some type of W3C WAI branding on the presentation?

I really like the clean look and feel of the presentation.  As we work on other presentations that we have, will we be moving those into this design?    The consistent look and feel will help to give people the impression that these mini-tutorials are all part of a greater curriculum on web accessibility.

If we are calling this a tutorial and not a slide set and referring to them as pages instead of slides, will people get the fact that if you click on the slide it takes you to the next one?  Just by looking at the page do you get the "mental model" that this is a slide set?

Cheers,
Justin



******************
Justin Thorp
Contractor - Library of Congress
e - juth@loc.gov
p - 202/707-9541

>>> Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> 10/04/06 2:19 PM >>>

Dear EOWG Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 6 October 2006 teleconference follow.

Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
             http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html 

Agenda:

1. Components of Web Accessibility: A 10 Minute Tutorial [working title]
   - Latest version:
	http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all.htm 
   - About the Components of Web Accessibility Tutorial:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components-tutorial 
   - Requirements and changelog:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self 

STATUS:
- Text complete. Please review thoroughly.
- Style and images are still rough. Please read the list of open items in the changelog at:
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self.html#changes >

Questions for your review:

a. Any additional comments overall: How is this version meeting the requirements? Does it contain the right amount of content and detail? How is the tone?

b. Any comments on edits from last week? Particularly:
- the first page/slide
- the new one 17 "Accessibility Support Example"
Changelog items from last week at:
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self.html#d2006-09-22 >

c. How do we want to differentiate the Alt text example bullets? Some options:
i. <code> alt: prototyped in 7 "Web Content with Alt Text"
ii. <strong> alt text example: prototyped in 8 "Browsers Getting Web Content"
iii. <em>(italic) alt text example: prototyped in 9 "Assistive Technologies Getting Web Content"
iv. parenthesis around all: prototyped in 10 "Users Getting Web Content"
v. nothing: prototyped in 11 "Developers Creating Web Content"
vi. other?

d. What do we call this and others like it?
The last 2 weeks we came up with title ideas and agreed to think more about it. We have tried:
- Components of Web Accessibility: A 10-Minute Tutorial
- Components of Web Accessibility: Mini-Tutorial
- Components of Web Accessibility: A Walk-Through
There is still some concern about "10 Minute Tutorial" as it may take some people longer, especially some people with disabilities. Other ideas that we have had are in the 15 & 22 Sept minutes linked to from <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self.html#refs >
- Note that we probably don't want to use "Overview" or "Introduction" as those are used for other types of WAI resources
- Note that the week before last we decided to: "title the material format-neutral (e.g., don't use the term "slides" in the title)"

Regards,
~ Shawn & Judy

===

IRC reminders and tips:
- IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All 
substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
- to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type 
/me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
will come out:
*shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html 
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim 
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot 
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/ 

* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings 

###
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 02:15:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:55 UTC