- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:42:01 -0800
- To: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>, eowg <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Wayne Dick wrote: > What do you think. More important, is anything just > wrong? Does it make sense? It makes a great deal of sense. The closest to "wrong" I find are points that always "stick" in our various guidelines: little is considered about the need for accommodation in regard to accessibility for those who come under the general rubric of "cognitive disabilities"; the continuing absence of any available authoring tools that pay enough attention to both the use of such tools and of their "product." One reason for addressing the former is that we so often, in the working groups credit the notion of "clear and simple" language being a central part of the accessibility picture. I'm not sure what your document could do about this but it's worth considering. The role of entities like yours in pressuring vendors to make their authoring tools compliant with ATAG is central to our goals. Love.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 00:42:21 UTC