- From: Libby Cohen <lcohen@usm.maine.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:27:19 -0500
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
In the Evaluation Tools section, the following is not a sentence: Perform a static analysis of pages or sites regarding their accessibility, and return a report or a rating. Suggest revising it to: Evaluation tools perform a static analysis...... " Is the subscript TM used consistently? Some tools may have other symbols associated with them, such as c for copyright or R for registered trademark. If we are unsure about the consistent use of these symbols, I suggest that their use be deleted. I think that the descriptions are clear. It's a useful document. Libby Cohen Judy Brewer wrote: > > Just a reminder to please review and comment to the EOWG list on the > document "Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools" in advance of > our teleconference this Friday. > > Thank you, > > - Judy > >> From: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org> >> To: "'EOWG'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> >> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:21:52 +0100 >> Subject: Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools >> >> Hi, >> >> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/selectingtools.html> >> >> According to this weeks agenda, we will be discussing this new >> version of the draft in our meeting. Please feel free to also send >> comments to the list, I'd be especially interested in knowing how >> well this version clarifies the different types of tools and which >> issues it still needs to address. >> >> Looking forward to a fruitful discussion. >> >> Regards, >> Shadi >> >> >> --- --- >> Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe >> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org >> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI >> 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France >> Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 17:30:37 UTC