- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:56:39 -0400
- To: Barry McMullin <mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie>, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
- Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Barry, At 03:37 PM 6/17/2005 +0100, Barry McMullin wrote: >Hi all - > >Just to clarify the point I was trying to make on the telecon: I >was not suggesting to expand the demo resource in any way. As >Shadi rightly pointed out, there are tools out there to >facilitate demonstrating different "projections" of the site >under a wide variety of client side conditions. My point was the >rather trivial one that this comment in the "Structure section": > > 5.2 [The good site] Would be the same set of pages and same > appearance as the "bad site" above > >should have a little qualification, maybe just one extra word, >like this: > > 5.2 [The good site] Would be the same set of pages and same > *default* appearance as the "bad site" above > >Maybe there is a better word, but that was all the clarification >I was wanting to point at... Thanks for the clarification; I think that this provides a simpler way to address the concern that came up in last week's meeting. >My only other comment is again a minor one, that I'd like to >suggest that the "home page" in the bad site specifically use a >client side image map for the very front end site-wide navigation >(without ALT on the AREAs) so that it really fails fairly >catastrophically in the absence of ALT. Interesting idea. Shadi, Tanguy, any thoughts? Regards, - Judy >Happy coding! - Barry. -- Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530 32 Vassar Street Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 04:10:27 UTC