- From: Barry McMullin <mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:37:29 +0100 (IST)
- cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi all -
Just to clarify the point I was trying to make on the telecon: I
was not suggesting to expand the demo resource in any way. As
Shadi rightly pointed out, there are tools out there to
facilitate demonstrating different "projections" of the site
under a wide variety of client side conditions. My point was the
rather trivial one that this comment in the "Structure section":
5.2 [The good site] Would be the same set of pages and same
appearance as the "bad site" above
should have a little qualification, maybe just one extra word,
like this:
5.2 [The good site] Would be the same set of pages and same
*default* appearance as the "bad site" above
Maybe there is a better word, but that was all the clarification
I was wanting to point at...
My only other comment is again a minor one, that I'd like to
suggest that the "home page" in the bad site specifically use a
client side image map for the very front end site-wide navigation
(without ALT on the AREAs) so that it really fails fairly
catastrophically in the absence of ALT.
Happy coding! - Barry.
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 14:38:06 UTC