W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 1999

Content negotiation and SMIL players.

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 16:50:34 -0400
Message-ID: <37B4851A.C110CDCA@w3.org>
To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Geoff Freed <Geoff_Freed@wgbh.org>, Madeleine Rothberg <Madeleine_Rothberg@wgbh.org>, marja@w3.org, ij@w3.org, ph@w3.org, robneff@home.com
CC: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Robert Neff wrote:
> > 8.  file extensions RM and RTX are used without explanation.  are there more
> > extensions?  See item 3

Here's an example:

   <audio src="audio.rm">
   <textstream src="closed-caps.rtx">

Should we include the suffixes at all? I don't know 
how SMIL players handle content negotiation,
but if possible, shouldn't we promote it?

Of course, we could still show examples
with suffixes, but indicate that content
negotiation is preferred.

 - Ian

Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel/Fax:                     +1 212 684-1814
Received on Friday, 13 August 1999 20:00:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:46 UTC