W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: fwd: Draft of re-organized WAI home page

From: Sheela Sethuraman <ssethuraman@cast.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:54:33 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Some thoughts on the re-drafted WAI home page.

1. I like the way the headlines are presented now. I am not sure we need a
'headline' hyperlink along with the other links though.

2. The Resource section is definitely more user-friendly.  Maybe the 4
links to external resources should be separated out a little in some way. 

3. The Participation section needs to be reworked, I think.  Unlike the
resource section, this does not make for an easy read.  I prefer the
original version with WAI Technical Activity, WAI IPO, Involvement..etc.
While it may make the page a little longer, it is easier to look for the
information than in the current Participation section. 

4. It is good not having a long list of events on the main page.

Sheela Sethuraman

At 08:18 AM 7/23/99 -0400, Judy Brewer wrote:
>Reminder, no EOWG meeting today Friday July 23, however comments &
>discussion still needed on the proposed re-draft of the WAI home page
>described below. Please focus on content re-organization on this round,
>with more discussion of styling & presentation to come later.
>- Judy
>>Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 22:32:36 -0400
>>To: w3c-wai-eo
>>From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
>>Subject: Draft of re-organized WAI home page
>>Cc: janet, w3t-wai, w3c-wai-cg
>>For discussion during Friday July 16 meeting:
>>It was easier to think through the re-organization of the home page using
>a mocked-up page, rather than just send around a list of topics. 
>>Some links are active, some are not; if we like this set-up I'd need to
>put in a number of sub-pages to back these up. Some links are to resources
>not yet created or finalized, so we can see how it hangs together; they'd
>be taken off the actual home page until they're ready.
>>Here's the draft re-org:
>>	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/WAI-home
>>Here's the original for comparison:
>>	http://www.w3.org/WAI
>>Is it: clearer? friendlier? easier to get to find really useful resources?
>easier to use by different audiences? etc.?
>>I realize it's just flat text for now; we can throw in some styling later.
>>- Judy
>Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
>Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
>World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Friday, 23 July 1999 10:01:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:46 UTC