W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: Fw: Checkpoint 3.3

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:43:01 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I am closing the discussion of Checkpoint 3.3 on the Education and Outreach
WG list. It will continue on the Web Content Guidelines Working Group list,
which is the appropriate place for this discussion at this point. Archives
of that mailing list and subscription information for that list are
available from the working group home page at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL.

The Web Content Guidelines Working Group will report back to WAI IG and to
the EOWG once resolved.

Thank you,


At 07:13 AM 7/21/99 -0400, Neff, Robert wrote:
>How does every one feel, if we were to make a separate checkpoint section
>for all CSS relaed items?  We could even put check point 11.1 as the lead
>checkpoint for this CSS.  That way, "Use W3C technologies when they are
>available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when
>supported" is up front and if someone chooses not to use CSS then this whole
>section becomes "Not applicable". 
>Thanks to Judy for pointing out Checkpoint 11.1 <smile>.
>my difficulty now is if i am rating a site's conformance or if some one is
>rating this for me, then we really have to dig and causes extra work.  We
>need to streamline the review process as I am sure other people besides me
>would appreciate this!
>I think we can look at this from a usability focus.  Basically CSS is all
>over and rightly so, but does it make sense to centralize this?
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 13:56:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:46 UTC