- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:53:18 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Oh. I do prefer the full URI, including the http:// bit
Charles McCN
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
I prefer just the guidelines URI, on teh basis that in the guidelines first
line, and again in teh contents is a checklist...
(Besides, the checklist URI is pretty horribly long and difficult. Hardly a
good example of writing clearly.)
Charles
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, William Loughborough wrote:
JB:: "Short & sweet?
Check your work. Validate. Use evaluation tools, WCAG guidelines and
checklist www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT."
WL: I'd still like to add the checklist URL and find a way to shorten
both it and the one for the guidelines. I think we made room by
curtailing #9. But the "short & sweet?" is a "definite maybe" as Sam
Goldwyn used to say.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 16 July 1999 13:53:22 UTC