W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: frames

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:30:09 -0400 (EDT)
To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
cc: E & O <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907161029430.22614-100000@tux.w3.org>
There is an "s" - I just checked the specification

NOFRAMES

Charles

On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

  Slight change:
  
  Frames: use _noframes_, and meaningful _title_ or _name_ attribute.
  
  (I would drop attribute to fit the line)
  
  Actually, "alt" is also only an example...
  
  Charles
  
  On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, William Loughborough wrote:
  
    QuickTips #8:
    
    The argument that only priority 1 items can be on the card is already
    broken since "title" attribute is only ever given as an example and
    "name" not at all in the checkpoints, therefore "noframe" is just as
    permissible.
    
    Proposal:
    
    Frames. Use "noframe"[format shows it as an element]. Use _title_ or
    _name_ attribute.
    -- 
    Love.
                ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
    http://dicomp.pair.com
    
  
  --Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
  phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
  W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
  MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Friday, 16 July 1999 10:30:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:25 GMT