W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 2011

Review of ATAG responses to IBM comments

From: Sueann Nichols <ssnichol@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:41:20 -0400
To: jrichards@ocad.ca, Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
Cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFDBAF23B8.9D101A6E-ON85257929.004F7264-85257929.0050B048@us.ibm.com>



Hello,

Overall the responses seem reasonable. I do have a concern with one of the
blocking issues raised on the conformance claim.  Why is ATAG not using the
same or  very similar conformance claim from WCAG 2.0?   Given that's
language people are now familiar with, wouldn't it make sense to be
consistent with that language?

Reference:
The link to the comments is here:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/atag20-8Jul10LC-comments-updated14july2011.html



Sueann Nichols

Phone: (720) 396-6739 (t/l) 938-6739
ssnichol@us.ibm.com
IBM Human Ability & Accessibility Center
http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 15:20:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 October 2011 15:20:36 GMT