W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2010

FW: Qualifier "[For the authoring tool user interface]"

From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:47:57 -0400
To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F2C77FB59A1A4840A01EF5F59B1826E2090950A46B@ocadmail.ocad.ca>
Although it contributes to wordiness, I support keeping the " the authoring tool user interface" clause in the guidelines (perhaps using "()") to keep it as clear as possible what part of the document the reader is in.


(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844
Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://inclusivedesign.ca/
Faculty of Design | OCAD University

-----Original Message-----
From: public-atag2-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-atag2-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Chuter
Sent: September 1, 2010 1:19 PM
To: public-atag2-comments@w3.org
Subject: Qualifier "[For the authoring tool user interface]"

I think that readability would be improved if this qualifier was put at
the end. When reading the document sequentially it is clear which section
each guideline applies to. Screen reader users can discern this from the
letter A or B in the guideline reference.

It seems strange that there is no qualifier for the part B guidelines.

I agree with Greg that parentheses would be more appropriate [1], although
for style reasons.

For example, rather than
"Guideline A.3.6: [For the authoring tool user interface] Manage
preference settings."
"Guideline A.3.6: Manage preference settings (for the authoring tool user
or even simply
"Guideline A.3.6: Manage preference settings."

Alan Chuter,
Accessibility and User Experience Department,
Technosite - Fundosa group (ONCE Foundation),
Tel: 91 121 03 30
E-mail: achuter@technosite.es

Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 20:48:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:59 UTC