W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Input needed before next AUWG call

From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:31:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4BABAC16.7020404@utoronto.ca>
To: Sueann Nichols <ssnichol@us.ibm.com>
CC: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>, w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org
Hi SueAnn,

Just to clarify, the SC is not tied to a conformance claim..."included" 
and "excluded" technologies are part of conformance but remember that a 
tool can conform without making a conformance claim.

The note about the conformance claim just reminds claimants that these 
will need to be spelled out in a claim (this is also said in the 
Conformance Claim requirements) so we could safely drop the note if you 
like.

BTW: The clause that says anyone can make a claim predates claims being 
optional and was intended to allow third-party reviewers to increase the 
number of ATAG conformance claims. I wonder if it is worth considering 
limiting claims to the developers of tools?

Cheers,
Jan





On 25/03/2010 1:46 PM, Sueann Nichols wrote:
> Sue Nichols
>
> 877-202-9272 (t/l) 930-0636
> ssnichol@us.ibm.com
> IBM Human Ability & Accessibility Center
> http://www.ibm.com/able
>
> Inactive hide details for Jan Richards ---03/24/2010 01:48:15 PM---Hi
> all, Here are the questions again that need answers this Jan Richards
> ---03/24/2010 01:48:15 PM---Hi all, Here are the questions again that
> need answers this week (with more
>
>
> From:	
> Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
>
> To:	
> WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
>
> Date:	
> 03/24/2010 01:48 PM
>
> Subject:	
> Input needed before next AUWG call
>
> Sent by:	
> w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here are the questions again that need answers this week (with more
> specific links for (2) and (3). ALSO an extra paragraph has been added
> on Jutta's suggestion to the intent for B.2.2.7 so please take a look:
>
> (1) B.2.1.1 Decision Support Proposal
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0126.html
> ___Accept the proposal
> ___Recommend changes (see comments field)
> __x_The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field)
> ___Disagree with the proposal
> ___Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group
> Comments:
> SN Comment: Claims can be made by anyone, and there may be no
> association between the claimant and the tool, so it doesn't seem
> logical to tie the success criterion to the claim. If claims could only
> be made by the people that created the Web tool, then a the claim could
> be tied to the success criterion.
>
> 2-B.2.2.6 Status Report: Reworded Intent and Examples
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0135.html
> _x__Accept the proposal
> ___Recommend changes (see comments field)
> ___The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field)
> ___Disagree with the proposal
> ___Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group
> Comments:
>
> 3-B.2.2.7 Metadata Production: Reworded Intent and Examples
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010JanMar/0136.html
> _x__Accept the proposal
> ___Recommend changes (see comments field)
> ___The proposal needs more discussion (see comments field)
> ___Disagree with the proposal
> ___Neutral - will accept the consensus of the group
> Comments:
>
>
>
>
> --
> (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
> jan.richards@utoronto.ca | 416-946-7060
>
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
> Faculty of Information | University of Toronto
>
>
>

-- 
(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jan.richards@utoronto.ca | 416-946-7060

Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information | University of Toronto
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:32:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:32:36 GMT